Archive | January 18, 2017

Science & social responsibility in public health

Epidemiologists and environmental health researchers have a joint responsibility to acquire scientific knowledge that matters to public health and to apply the knowledge gained in public health practice. We examine the nature and source of these social responsibilities, discuss a debate in the epidemiological literature on roles and responsibilities, and cite approaches to environmental justice as reflective of them. At one level, responsibility refers to accountability, as in being responsible for actions taken. A deeper meaning of responsibility corresponds to commitment to the pursuit and achievement of a valued end

Public health ethics is on the map. In the past year, bioethicists and public health practitioners have begun to focus their critical attention on this complex and understudied topic. Much remains to be done. Childress et al. (2002), for example, describe their account of public health ethics as a rough conceptual map of a terrain with undefined boundaries.

Our focus will be on the responsibilities of epidemiologists, a choice made for several compelling reasons. Epidemiology sits at the center of the science and practice of environmental health, and more generally, at the center of public health. Although it is often referred to as a basic science of public health, epidemiology connects the acquisition of scientific knowledge with its application in preventive interventions, programs, and policies. This connection suggests a fundamental question: What are our responsibilities as epidemiologists? Do we, for example, have a joint responsibility to participate in science and to apply the knowledge gained? This is a key concern for us as researchers, health professionals, and as teachers.

The social responsibility of public health professionals is but one of many concerns in the broader picture of public health ethics. It is nevertheless a central concern. As Ogletree (1996) reminds us, responsibility is a concept particularly well suited to flame many key aspects of the ethics of professions faced with making decisions and taking actions in complex situations. These decisions often involve advanced technologies, high levels of specialization, and overlapping areas of expertise and concern among decision makers from diverse educational, political, and social backgrounds, precisely the situation in contemporary epidemiology and public health. In sum, responsibility organizes many (although not all) of public health’s ethical issues in terms appropriate for professional practitioners.

Responsibility has a deeper meaning as well, corresponding to commitment. To be responsible means to be committed to someone or to some thing. Being responsible in this deeper sense involves a commitment to positive action, to the pursuit and achievement of something of value, such as a social good (Jonas 1984). We will return to the notion of social goods in public health. For now, we want to emphasize that responsibility focuses attention on professional commitments

Finally, our inquiry is intended to assist all public health researchers who seek to define their social responsibilities. For those who are involved primarily in environmental health research, we can think of at least two connected and current topics–environmental justice and community-based participatory research.

Compare car insurance quotes in California online

Few decades back cars used to be a luxury commodity. People belonging form the higher status group were only able to purchase cars. It was a status symbol back then. Today anyone can buy a personal car for his or her requirements. There are a number of different car manufacturing companies present in the market today. Each company provides customers and buyers with a number of easy instalments plans. With the help of these plans, anyone with an average earning can buy a car easily. In most of the countries in the world, car insurance is mandatory for car owners.

A car insurance policy helps the insured person to protect his or her valuable asset. In case of auto theft and accidents, an insurance policy can help you financially. These policies and plans help car owners in times of distress. There are different types of car insurance policies available in the market today. Mainly these policies are of three types – liability coverage plan, collision coverage plan and comprehensive coverage plan. According to your needs and requirements, you can choose a plan for your car. Think carefully before selecting any insurance policies or plans. Do not make any haste decisions regarding insurance.

Most of the people choose the comprehensive coverage plan to protect their cars. This coverage plan protects you financially in case of auto thefts and accidents. The other two plans do not provide full coverage, thus individuals generally choose the comprehensive plan. It is more flexible and extensive in nature. You can also ask for a customised coverage plan for yourself and your car if you want. The premium rates and the coverage cost depend on a number of factors. For instance, a SUV’s premium rates will be more or higher than an ordinary family car. The model and make of your car are the primary factors that specify the rates.

If you do not have much knowledge about car insurance companies and policies, then ask a knowledgeable person or a reliable agent. There are a number of insurance companies present in the market now. Sometimes it can be confusing for a car owner to choose a specific company for themselves. Use the internet services to learn more about car insurance. You can check on different plans online. If you are looking for car insurance quotes in California, then type car insurance quotes California or California car insurance quotes in the search box of your webpage to get appropriate results. You can ask for quotes from more than one company.

A Connecticut Auto Insurance Quotes helps the insured person to protect his or her valuable asset. Get more details visit at .